God is our Guide  Number 1 site for helping reverse diseases on Planet Earth

   

 

 
Home
Diagnosis
Treatment
Pathology
Variants
CIDP info
Fibromyalgia
IVIG
Anti-inflammatory Diet
Burning  Feet Home
Services Page
Chronic Fatigue
Autoimmune diseases
Prognosis
Bible healing
Celiac disease

Coconut oil Benefits

Rheumatoid antibiotics

Multiple Sclerosis

Claybath

LiverFlush

Heavy Metal

Canola

FoodToxin

Food additives

Oils for health

Jfkennedy disease

Cancer Regan

MS GENES

 Polymyalgia

 Achalasia

Lead poisoning

Tobacco slow poison

endocrine disrupters

Toxic makeup

poison at home

spinal pain

Toxic Baby products

New Vaccine

Vasculitis

Vinegar Benefits

GERD

 

  Multiple Sclerosis treatment with Antibiotics  CIDPUSA Foundation

  alternatives treatment of autoimmune disease read our e-book 

Special GoogleHealth Search

Antibiotic Use and Risk of Multiple Sclerosis
Alvaro Alonso1, Susan S. Jick2, Hershel Jick2 and Miguel A. Hernán1

Some reports suggest that bacteria, including Chlamydophila pneumoniae, could be involved in the etiology of multiple sclerosis. If that is true, persons who used antibiotics active against these bacteria, compared with nonusers, might be at lower risk of multiple sclerosis. Using a 1993–2000 case-control study nested in the United Kingdom–based General Practice Research Database cohort, the authors identified 163 multiple sclerosis cases who were followed up for at least 3 years before their first symptoms (the index date). Up to 10 controls matched to the cases by age, sex, general practice, and time in the cohort were selected. Exposure to antibiotics was assessed through computerized medical records. Overall antibiotic use or use of antibiotics against C. pneumoniae was not associated with multiple sclerosis risk. However, use of penicillins in the 3 years before the index date decreased the risk of developing a first attack of multiple sclerosis (odds ratio = 0.5, 95% confidence interval: 0.3, 0.9 for those who used penicillins for 15 days compared with no use). In conclusion, use of antibiotics active against C. pneumoniae was not associated with a decreased risk of short-term multiple sclerosis. The observed lower risk of multiple sclerosis for penicillin users needs to be confirmed in other populations.


anti-bacterial agents; Chlamydophila pneumoniae; multiple sclerosis; prospective studies

Why doxycycline and roxithromycin (or azithromycin)?

Both are oral, both are active against Chlamydia pneumoniae, both are relatively inexpensive. They are relatively risk-free. They act synergically against test strains of the organism; giving both together would be the equivalent of giving a four-fold increase of each drug were it to be given alone. The drugs work on different steps in the bacterial protein synthesis pathway. Combination therapy reduces the chance of the emergence of resistance. Both drugs pass into the brain. Both reach good levels inside cells. This is very important. Both are well tolerated. Azithromycin is an alternative to roxithromycin. They deplete the organisms slowly: this is very important, as the release of bacterial endotoxins should not be sudden.

Rifampicin may also be considered. It, too, is synergic with doxycycline, penetrates the brain and is active intracellularly. It is not suitable for intermittent use. It is highly active, and, in patients with a large bacterial load, it may give rise to intense reactions.
 


Why are later short courses of metronidazole to be taken together with these antimicrobials?


Chlamydiae are complex organisms. Long ago their ancestors must once have been free-living bacteria which possessed their own energy-generating pathways. The transformation from EB to RB is an active change, and an active change implies the retention of at least some of these pathways. The ones with the most utility for this purpose would be anaerobic, and thus susceptible to metronidazole.

Doxycycline and roxithromycin block the replicating phase by inhibiting protein synthesis and may be expected to force the organism to maintain itself by using its own primitive anaerobic respiratory mechanisms. In this suspended state it would be susceptible to anti-anaerobic agents such as metronidazole.

This is borne out by clinical evidence. The administration of metronidazole after doxycycline in a patient with likely high-load Chl pneumoniae infection causes a bacteriolytic reaction more severe than that following the original administration of doxycycline.

However, there is a difference: in this leg of treatment there is no risk of the emergence of resistance, for the organism is unable to replicate. Metronidazole need thus be given in courses only as long as can be tolerated. 

Five-day courses of metronidazole at three-week intervals, during continuous treatment with doxycycline and roxithromycin, would seem reasonable; at first, metronidazole may be limited to one or two doses on one or two days to judge the severity of reaction.

The eventual aim would be to give all three agents intermittently. This, the final leg of treatment, would entail a 14 day course of doxycycline and roxithromycin, with metronidazole given from day five for five days. (The reason for continuing doxycycline and roxithromycin for a few days after the metronidazole has been stopped is because these drugs both possess anti-inflammatory activity which may prevent a reaction to the organisms killed by metronidazole.) This course would be given once a month. After several months the intervals between the antibiotics would be cautiously extended.
 


Why this complex antibiotic regime?

The literature is filled with instances of treatment-failure in serologically-proven chronicChl pneumoniae infections of non-CNS systems, whether macrolides, tetracyclines or rifampicin have been used. When the drug is stopped, even after months of treatment, serology rises, and the patient relapses.

The intensive cyclical regime of combined antimicrobials outlined here corrals the pathogen, initially halting replication, then eliminating stalled intracellular forms. Extracellular forms may be depleted by giving N-acetyl cysteine (see below.)

No single antimicrobial agent can be expected to achieve this effectiveness against every phase of the organism's life.